Does Graston really break up scar tissue?

What is a contraindication for Graston Technique?

A contraindication for the Graston Technique is any condition that would make the patient unable tolerate the procedure. Contraindications may be classified as temporary or permanent. Temporary contraindications are those conditions that are resolved prior to the procedure. Permanent contraindications are those conditions that have not been resolved and will remain permanently disabling.

Permanent Contraindications: The Graston Technique is not indicated in the following conditions: The diagnosis is open fracture of a long bone or a fracture with a significant risk of nonunion Fracture of the shaft of a long bone Open fracture of a metatarsal or tarsal bones Significant soft tissue injury in the same limb Fracture of the distal radius or ulna A fracture of the distal radius or ulna that is greater than 6 cm in length (this is determined by the surgeon) Severe systemic disease Acute infection. Temporary Contraindications: All conditions listed below that have not been determined to be permanent contraindications Infection Pain from nerve compression. Possible Conditions. Open fracture of a long bone Fracture of the shaft of a long bone Fracture of the distal radius or ulna Severe systemic disease Acute infection Nerve compression. Procedure. What is the procedure? The Graston Technique is a surgical technique that is performed under local anesthesia. It can be used to treat acute injuries, including fractures, dislocations, and tendinitis of the rotator cuff.

What is the recovery time after the procedure? There are no restrictions on the patient's activity. Most patients can return to their normal routine within one to two days.

When is the procedure performed? The Graston Technique is performed by an orthopedic surgeon. What are the risks associated with the procedure? Complications are uncommon, but they can occur. Temporary complications may include: Bruising that resolves within one to two days Fever Pain Swelling that resolves within two to three days. Permanent complications may include: Nonunion of a fractured bone Infection Loss of function in the fractured bone. What type of anesthesia is used?

Can Graston Technique cause nerve damage?

By
KATIE BOUGOUIN Last Updated: Aug 24, 2025.

Katie Boughin began writing professionally in 2025. Her articles have appeared in a number of online publications and print magazines, including The History Bookshelf, "The Write Stuff" and A2Z Magazine. She has a bachelor's degree in theater arts and communications from California State University Northridge.

One of the most common orthopedic procedures performed to the feet is a skin graft. One method of skin grafting involves using a skin abrasion kit, which consists of a toolkit with a small circular blade, known as a grasper or grasptome, and a sponge saturated with antiseptic solution. When using the grasper, the doctor must carefully avoid cutting the tissue beneath the skin to minimize damage to the underlying nerve or blood vessels.

Graston Technique. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Mayo Clinic The Graston Technique, also called "the grasptome technique," was invented by Dr. Robert I. Graston in 1984. The Graston Technique is an orthopedic procedure that was designed to help repair damaged cartilage that has been caused by an injury.

A physician uses the toolkit to remove bone spurs from an area where the cartilage is damaged. This can be performed on any joint in the body, but the most common application of the toolkit is on the knee.

The toolkit consists of a handheld tool known as the grasper or grasptome. This tool allows the physician to access a precise amount of cartilage while protecting the tissue. After removing the bone spur, the surgeon uses the device to stimulate a bleeding clot at the site of the cartilage injury. Then, the surgeon places a sterile saline-saturated sponge directly over the clot and pushes the device back and forth through the joint capsule to extract the bone fragment. After the bone fragment is removed, the physician cleans the site and sutures the wound closed.

Safety. Skin grafting is a common and necessary surgical procedure, but the procedure carries a risk of complications. When performing skin grafting, it is critical that the physician avoids cutting the tissue beneath the skin, as this could result in damaging the underlying nerve or blood vessels.

Is Graston better than massage?

I have been to massage therapists for the last two years and have had a.

great time. I was wondering what the difference between Does anyone have any idea? Thanks.

The best massage I ever had was from a Graston therapist. He worked my entire body. And that was about eight years ago. I've
Had only one other massage since then, and it was ok. But it wasn't good, and I am sure that if I had gone to the Graston guy it would. Have been great. The second best massage I ever had was from a massage therapist. Who used Graston machines. The results were good, but not as good as the first massage. And, I know that Graston is not the only thing that a therapist. Can use to get you better results. I know this is a long post, but it's really important for people. To know about Graston and how good it can make your experience of. Getting massaged. When I was young, my dad always took me to the dentist. When I was 14, he got me into Graston for my first massage. It was a fabulous experience, and it changed my life. I would recommend Graston to everyone. The results are so good, and they last a long time. A big thank you to all those who responded to this thread. I

Posted by: Rhett. Thank you for your response. As I understand it, Graston is just one method of manipulating. The joints. I know there are other methods.

That's why I was asking if there is any difference between. Graston and massage. Also, I'm curious about how you felt the Graston experience was. Was it something you enjoyed? Did you have pain before getting. Graston, and did you enjoy getting rid of that pain?

Does Graston really break up scar tissue?

Yes, and it has been proven in many studies.

Here's a typical scenario: A patient experiences pain in the right shoulder after a fall, which is then diagnosed as a shoulder separation. The usual treatment involves several weeks of physical therapy to realign the joints and then the patient is discharged with a splint and a doctor's advice to go back to the office once a week to keep the shoulder immobilized.

But in reality, the injury was a torn rotator cuff. It's time to get the real story. I was once one of those unfortunate people who had to live with the memory of a torn rotator cuff for the rest of my life. I'd played hockey since I was 12 years old, and at 25 years old I was going on 14 years without a major shoulder injury. I skated in several high-level junior hockey leagues in Canada and in the United States before landing in the National Hockey League. Injuries to my left shoulder were not uncommon, but after having been hit by a check and injuring my right shoulder during a game in 2025, I was forced to play hurt for the next six months.

I would have preferred to have never experienced an injury to my shoulder at all. But in hockey, nothing is guaranteed.

When I finally felt healthy enough to return to my game, I thought I would be able to play as normal as ever. But I couldn't. I couldn't lift my arm over my head, had difficulty throwing a pass, couldn't control my game-speed properly, and was always worried that my shoulder would give out on me.

As time went on, I started to get the feeling that something was going to happen. It wasn't an unpleasant feeling, but I knew what it was: rotator cuff syndrome. The diagnosis came after an MRI scan of my shoulder showed that the tear was severe enough to require surgery.

A few years later, I still had the same problem. I could barely lift my arm over my head, my hand trembled when I played, and it was virtually impossible for me to throw a pass.

I started to work on my form to see if I could recover. I did everything I could to try to fix my mechanics, but it didn't make any difference. I had tried everything.

Eventually I got the surgery, and the last thing I expected was to end up playing again.