Is NordLynx better than OpenVPN?

Did NordVPN remove obfuscated servers?

I've read recently on Reddit that NordVPN has been removing servers from their lists and that they are taking a stance that you're a human not an automated service. I've reached out to them and I'm waiting to see how the story unfolds, but I wanted to verify some things in advance and ask you guys. Is it true that they are making changes based on user's IP address?

Also, another point, is everyone who is using NordVPN on VPNBookmarking still getting their servers listed there (ie if the website doesn't list any servers when you scroll down to the bottom of the page), or do you know of sites where VPNBookmarking is showing that they are no longer accessible? Re: NordVPN removed obfuscated servers? The first and most important point I'd like to clear up is whether or not this issue applies to you, or if it is a common problem for everyone (I had mine work fine before and also after unblocking). The second point I'd like to clear up (I'm guessing a lot of users don't understand why it's an issue) is what an 'obfuscated server' actually means. There are many reasons why a company would have their server addresses be obscured by the software. However this issue specifically pertains to those who are trying to identify themselves as being automated programs instead of a human being. In this case a computer may identify a group of IPs as being an actual computer, whereas a human person (not likely, but possible) will simply look at a large number of IPs and attempt to get a better sense of which ones actually belong to humans. The best way to make sure that your server is truly available is to access and to open a browser (if using a phone) and access the page, then close the browser and return back to the site again - if you are logged into the site and are currently browsing the VPNbookmarking servers, they should be listed there. If all is well the information should say "All VPNservers are fully active and online." If however there is something wrong with one of the servers you can access any number of websites and try and get an idea of which ones are currently up.

I hope I explained this well enough.

Does NordVPN work with Linux?

Yes, we have native client for Linux. We have recently added a guide on how to install it using Ubuntu and Arch Linux. You may also use your distro's software center or download an appropriate .deb file. The latest version of the native client at the time of writing is version 2.4 and is available here:

Is NordVPN free? To clarify, no it is not free. While we accept donations on our NordVPN website, we do not give out any free hardware (like routers or VPN gateways) or free accounts. If you are planning to use NordVPN for free, you should just take note that you are not anonymous, you cannot avoid getting charged by the server, and you must trust NordVPN if they do not protect your identity and privacy.

We offer VPN service for free with ads. Ads are a common practice but we make efforts to keep the number of ads as low as possible while still making a profit so you are always offered high-quality product for as cheap or for free. There are multiple ways to support NordVPN - visit our Donate page to learn more about them.

Is NordLynx better than OpenVPN?

NordLynx and OpenVPN are two of the most popular VPN services that use OpenVPN as their core protocol. Both have been around for a while, and both have their pros and cons. In this article, we'll compare NordVPN and OpenVPN side-by-side to help you decide which one is better for you.

First, a bit about OpenVPN. OpenVPN is a great tool for VPNs because it's simple, efficient, and easy to set up. However, if you're using OpenVPN for your VPN, there's a chance you're not getting the performance you want.

OpenVPN has a tendency to be a little slow for the type of high speed connections most users have these days. The biggest reason for this is that OpenVPN is built for a client/server model.

With a client/server model, there's always a master and a slave. The master server handles all the configuration and data for the VPN, while the slave server just transfers the data between the user and the master.

This is a great model for slower internet connections, but it doesn't do as well when the network connection speeds are high. Because OpenVPN is built to run on slower networks, the master server usually does a lot of processing. If you're on a high-speed network, this can slow down the VPN to a crawl.

OpenVPN also has a problem with latency. For example, if you're connecting to a remote server in New York and it's in Chicago, you'll have to wait a few milliseconds to start transferring data. This can cause some problems for many different applications.

While OpenVPN is a great tool for setting up a VPN, it's not the best choice if you want to get the fastest speeds possible. NordVPN, on the other hand, has a more traditional approach to VPNs. NordVPN is based on an older protocol called IPSec, and is far more efficient.

NordVPN also has a feature called Unified Mode. This allows NordVPN to work with most devices without any hassle. This means you don't have to mess around with configuring things on a per-device basis, and NordVPN can handle it all for you.

Are obfuscated servers slower?

In an ideal setting, a server like this would be completely encrypted, even inside a cloud solution. But you may know that most of the data isn't encrypted and so you may well run into traffic snooping issues (unless you're careful to only connect to the local server, as in the example above).

The first thing that occurs to me is that you can't really say that a server that's obfuscated is "slower" than one which isn't. For instance, suppose you're a government agency working on domestic surveillance. Your servers need to be fairly up-to-date, and so they get security updates regularly. By using the same key for everyone, you have a pretty good idea of which computers will get updates, which means that everyone knows that there are updates for anyone else to see.

If the only person to whom you share keys happens to be a single child who gets frequent updates, then that would mean that they get access to everyone else's secrets. If everyone had access to the real key though, then they'd get updated secrets automatically.

Does your server contain enough entropy to make attacks like this much more costly? In other words, if the attacker knows you have no secret-sharing between users, is he likely to attack just the server to learn your entire key instead of targeting individual users with the knowledge that they have no secret? Would it still be secure? (There are obviously plenty of cases in which the reverse is true. Suppose you share keys across 100 user accounts, but you're just an average user. You connect lots of times and so you have all of the attacker's knowledge, and the extra security provided by sharing.

I'm not trying to decide whether to do this or not. I think it's more about what type of server you want to use, and how.)

Well, I'm trying to figure out which server should get used. I'd like to use Tor, because it makes people happy. But some people complain that it makes servers slow and difficult to load (for example, TorGuard). Does one of those considerations outweigh the others? If I'd like to keep my network simple, would I better off using no secret sharing at all?

Related Answers

How do I enable obfuscated servers in NordVPN?

I recently set up a VPN on my PC for general use. I've used various forms...

Why can't I use obfuscated servers on NordVPN?

The server is obfuscated (hacked) by modifying the code of the server an...

How do I use obfuscated servers in NordVPN?

A few days ago I wanted to download some torrents and stumbled across the IP...